[CPD Talk] ListCo Disputes: Parties, Perspectives, and Playbook
Navigating listed company (ListCo) disputes requires far more than courtroom tactics—it demands balancing corporate control with strict regulatory compliance.
This CPD session delivers a concise, multi-perspective breakdown of ListCo Disputes: Parties, Perspectives, and Playbook. Moving beyond standard corporate litigation, our speakers will explore real-world power struggles between shareholders, boards, lenders, and liquidators, unpacking key tactical maneuvers like EGM requisitions, injunctions, and provisional liquidations. Attendees will gain actionable strategies for handling high-stakes regulatory hurdles—including trade suspensions and Stock Exchange requisitions—while mastering the core 4 “C”s Framework: Control, Compliance, Cost-efficiency, and Cross-Border execution.
We are pleased to welcome guest speakers Roy Leung (Managing Partner) and Mathew Liu (Partner) from Sit, Fung, Kwong & Shum, together with Anson Wong Yu Yat, to share essential insights and practical guidance for both legal practitioners and corporate stakeholders.
Event Details:
🗓️ Date: Friday, 18 September 2026
🕔 Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM (Followed by a drinks reception)
🗣️ Language: English & Cantonese
📍 Venue: 9/F, One Lippo Centre, 89 Queensway, Admiralty
⚖️ CPD Accreditation: 1 point (application in progress)
👤 Speakers: Roy Leung, Mathew Liu, Anson Wong Yu Yat
Roy Leung

Since admission as a solicitor in 1999, Roy has practised law for over 25 years, during which he has developed a wide spectrum of legal services, with focus on litigations, arbitrations and dispute resolutions. He is welcome by clients for proactive strategies and pragmatic solutions. He is particularly trusted by private clients to take care of a diverse range of personal legal issues.
Mathew Liu

Mathew provides holistic, practical and versatile legal services across a broad spectrum of disputes, as well as family and succession planning.
With experience in strategically advising in commercial disputes, insolvency and restructuring, contentious trust and administration of estate and professional disciplinary proceedings, Mathew navigates complex legal challenges effectively. Mathew also resourcefully handles litigations concerning debt recovery, land and property, building management, employment, defamation, personal injuries, as well as criminal proceedings. Mathew collaborates closely with liquidators, receivers, legal professionals in PRC, Singapore, United Kingdom, Australia, Bermuda, US (Delaware) and France, ensuring comprehensive support for international matters.
Anson Wong Yu Yat

“ Anson is a hardworking counsel whose legal knowledge is impressive. He is willing to test different arguments and go the extra mile for clients. His advocacy is excellent.”
“Anson has an exceptional ability to distill complex information into clear, high-level insights. It’s truly a pleasure to work with him.”
Legal 500 Asia-Pacific 2026
Administrative and Public Law – Tier 1 Leading Junior; Commercial Disputes – Leading Junior
Anson has appeared in more than 200 court judgments (including 20 cases in the Court of Final Appeal with 14 substantive appeals) over the mere span of 11 years’ call, reflecting the exceptional wealth of experience and exposure in civil litigation for his seniority.
Anson has developed a broad civil practice with particular interest in intellectual property and competition law matters. He is experienced in handling complex questions of law, including those of great general or public importance which reached the Court of Final Appeal. For example, he has recently appeared in (among others) three civil appeals before the Court of Final Appeal dealing with important questions concerning insolvency matters, land law and equity, service out of jurisdiction and statutory interpretation (see Re Hsin Chong Construction Co Ltd (2021) 24 HKCFAR 98, Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing (2021) 24 HKCFAR 116 and Fong Chak Kwan v Ascentic Ltd (2022) 25 HKCFAR 135 and Yim Tin Fook v To Sze On [2026] HKCFA 17). He also appeared in one of the first two enforcement actions before the Competition Tribunal, arguing issues relating to the burden and standard of proof as well as the proper approach for the determination of pecuniary penalties (see Competition Commission v W Hing Construction Co Ltd [2019] 3 HKLRD 46; [2020] 2 HKLRD 1229).
Please visit Anson’s profile for more details.
This article was first published on 7 September 2026.
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute legal advice and seeks to set out the general principles of the law. Detailed advice should therefore be sought from a legal professional relating to the individual merits and facts of a particular case. The photographs which appear in this article are included for decorative purposes only and should not be taken as a depiction of any matter to which the case is related. The views and opinions expressed in this article/material are solely those of the members authoring it and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Denis Chang’s Chambers, or of any other member or members of Denis Chang’s Chambers.