Ross Yuen and Eunice Lui delivered a CPD talk at Wilkinson & Grist on Redevelopment Value
On 24 November 2025, Ross Yuen and Eunice Lui delivered a CPD talk at Wilkinson & Grist on Redevelopment Value.
The talk first explained the meaning and different assessment methods of land value, contrasting the Redevelopment Value (RDV) with the Existing Use Value (EUV). It also analysed the role of RDV in different types of common legal disputes, including aborted en-bloc transactions, land resumption by the Government pursuant to the Lands Resumption Ordinance (Cap 124), and compulsory sale by private developers under the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance (Cap 545).
Specific scenarios relevant to the assessment of RDV, such as modification of lease with payment of land premium, building set-backs for bonus plot ratio, and adoption of MiC construction method, were also discussed.
Ross and Eunice had a fruitful discussion with members of Wilkinson & Grist following the talk, and would like to thank Wilkinson & Grist for the kind invitation.
Ross Yuen
Ross has his practice mainly in property law (including Chancery, Trust and Probate) and commercial law. He regularly acts in compulsory sale and adverse possession cases. Advising on other land related matters such as conveyancing, building management and tenancy is also his regular practice.
Visit Ross’s profile for more details.
Eunice Lui
Eunice was called to the Bar in 2024 and joined Chambers in the same year. Eunice is developing a broad civil practice, with particular emphasis on land-related matters. Eunice has recently appeared in two compulsory sale cases with Ross, in which one case concerns a building in Wong Nai Chung Road, and the other case being Tai Chung Property Ltd v Chen Lan Sum Irene (LDCS 4000/2023) [2025] HKLdT 40, which involves a building erected under the old Civil Servants’ Cooperative Building Society Scheme. Eunice accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers’ work.
Visit Eunice’s profile for more details.
This article was first published on 5 December 2025.
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute legal advice and seeks to set out the general principles of the law. Detailed advice should therefore be sought from a legal professional relating to the individual merits and facts of a particular case. The photographs which appear in this article are included for decorative purposes only and should not be taken as a depiction of any matter to which the case is related. The views and opinions expressed in this article/material are solely those of the members authoring it and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Denis Chang’s Chambers, or of any other member or members of Denis Chang’s Chambers.